Sunday, 23 April 2017

Remembering and Time Travel



Is this a kind of time travel? Without any deliberate action on my part, a clear vision of the past appeared. In this case the distant past, some fifty years past. 

I was reading an article about gravity - some new theories, and suddenly there in what we have come to call our "minds-eye" [1] was a picture of a school classroom and the apparatus I had used to measure the force of gravity, this together with a slightly foggy image of the classroom wall where a light beam from a mirror mounted on the apparatus shone a spot.

This sudden and quite remarkably clear recollection inspired me to investigate the latest thinking on Gravity and then to write an article about it [2].

Perhaps surprisingly this is not the first time this recalling of distant memories has happened to me recently, and for this reason when I caught the end of a BBC Radio 4 programme on memory (19th April), my attention was grabbed.

In “The ideas that make us: Memory” [3], Bettany Hughes [4] interviewed Dr Catherine Loveday [5], a neuropsychologist from the University of Westminster, and asked, “do our memories make us, us?
Catherine answered, “I think there is something unique about human memory, the ability to travel back in time and to travel forward in time and to daydream. They are very much, I think, fundamentally part of what it is to be a human being, and we do it without thinking about it”.
She went on to say, “
we can’t think forward without thinking backwards... we use the building blocks of our past to create a narrative for the future”.

Bettany summarised the conversation, “memory doesn’t look backwards, it allows our minds to travel in time”.

This ability to travel in time, recalling incidents from ones past and then allowing these to shape ones future, would in itself be interesting, but add to that the seemingly statistically impossible intersection of the timelines of individuals, and you have something really quite intriguing. 


I had arranged to have lunch two days after listening to the radio broadcast, with someone who had been introduced to me a few weeks previously. 

To ensure that we had a productive meeting that morning I took the time to read something about her, in this case an article in a university journal I had found via a Google search. The article had just one reference at the end, “Bion WR. The psycho-analytic study of thinking” [6].
The reference had been appended as in the article she had mentioned that she made use of Bion’s theory of learning. For this reason I read the short paper as well as the article.

How strange then, at this specific point in time, to make the discovery when reading Wilfred Bion’s paper that he believed, “thinking has to be called into existence to cope with thoughts”.

In the first paragraph of this article I said, “This sudden and quite remarkably clear recollection inspired me to investigate the latest thinking on Gravity and then to write an article about it”. Certainly to process my quite unintended recollection I had started to think about the subject and this in turn led to more thoughts and actions.

After listening to the BBC radio broadcast I searched for research by Dr Catherine Loveday and found her 2015 research paper “Remembering, imagining, false memories & personal meanings” [7], in this paper she explains that the Autobiographical Memory (AM) [8], “is labile and intrinsically responsive to cues. Occasionally, on a daily basis an AM may spontaneously come to mind. Such involuntary memories often appear to be the result of a specific cue”.

While reading her paper I remembered that in 2011, as part of some work I was doing at the time, I had wanted to know more about areas such as “Cognitive Load” and “How Memory Works” and a friend at Cambridge had pointed me in the direction of the work of Alan Baddeley [9,10]

His work had provided me with insight into how our short and long term memory systems function, and interact, and it had become clear that our working memory [11] is in constant contact with our long-term memory [12] as well as providing an interface with our perception systems.

In his 2003 paper, “Working Memory: Looking back and looking forward” [13]. Alan explains at the end of his paper, “Our behaviour is clearly determined not by simple chains of cause and effect, but rather by a range of controlling factors that operate simultaneously at many different levels, often implicit, but sometimes explicit”.

But still this memory that had been recalled, without any conscious action on my part, was very old and there exists a common perception that as time passes our memories fade [14,15], so why was this memory so clear? 

With some investigation I discovered that in the case of “visual memories” [16], that is memories of objects, places, animals or people, our memory capacity seems to be quite incredible [17] and coupled with this vast storage capacity is an ability to reassemble memory fragments [18], allowing us to retrieve memories originally set down decades before.

But this vast memory store and retrieve system that we possess does have some flaws, Dr Catherine Loveday explains that our minds are able to fill in any gaps in our memories and this process can lead to both “time compression” [19] where a number of incidents are brought together when in reality they did not occur at the same time, and also remembrances that are not completely accurate [20].


Further research on the subject exposed a 2009 paper by Daniel Bernstein and Elizabeth Loftus, “How to Tell If a Particular Memory Is True or False” [21]. In this paper they report:

“We now know that suggestion and imagination can make a false memory feel and appear real”.

In essence, all memory is false to some degree.
Memory is inherently a reconstructive process, whereby we piece together the past to form a coherent narrative that becomes our autobiography. In the process of reconstructing the past, we color and shape our life’s experiences based on what we know about the world”.


How accurate was the image of the classroom my memory had recalled?

I will never know now as my old school building has now been replaced, but it was real enough to allow my recall of an experiment I had carried out then and to inspire my further investigation. I’m sure that for both philosophers and psychologists this area of human capability provides a rich panoply of questions for the future.

However, future research aside, what is clear is that the human mind can provide us with this amazing ability to travel back in time; our memories can certainly enhance our actions today and more than that they can help us to shape our direction in future times, we just need to keep an open mind. 





References:
  1. Minds-Eye or Mental Image - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mental_image
  2. Gravity emerges from history, J Patmore (2017) - http://jeffsbuzz.blogspot.co.uk/2017/04/gravity-emerges-from- history.html
  3. BBC Radio 4 - The Ideas That Make Us, Series 5, Memory – (19-04-17)
    http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b08mbgxm
  4. Bettany Hughes - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bettany_Hughes
  5. Dr Catherine Loveday - https://www.westminster.ac.uk/about-us/our-people/directory/loveday-catherine
  6. Bion WR (1962), The psycho-analytic study of thinking. International Journal of Psychoanalysis.1962; 43: 306–310 -
    http://www.philosophy-psychoanalysis.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/PEP-Web-The-Psycho-Analytic-Study-of-Thinking.pdf
  7. Conway, M. A. & Loveday, C (2015), Remembering, imagining, false memories & personal meanings, . Consciousness and Cognition, 33, pp. 574-581. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2014.12.002 - http://openaccess.city.ac.uk/14569/1/1-s2.0-S1053810014002293-main.pdf
  8. Autobiographical memory - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Autobiographical_memory
  9. Alan Baddeley - https://www.york.ac.uk/psychology/staff/academicstaff/ab50/
  10. Thinking about thinking – J Patmore (2011) - http://jeffsbuzz.blogspot.co.uk/2011/02/thinking-about-thinking.html
  11. Working Memory - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Working_memory
  12. Long-term memory - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Long-term_memory
  13. Baddeley, A (2003), 'Working memory: looking back and looking forward' Nature Reviews Neuroscience, vol 4, no. 10, pp. 829-39. DOI: 10.1038/nrn1201 - http://www.ccs.fau.edu/~bressler/EDU/AdvCogNeuro/pdf/confused.pdf
  14. Memories fade as time passes - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Decay_theory
  15. How memories form, fade, and persist over time - http://edition.cnn.com/2009/HEALTH/01/28/memory.research/index.html
  16. Visual Memory - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Visual_memory
  17. Timothy F. Brady et al, (2008), Visual long-term memory has a massive storage capacity for object details, Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139 - http://www.pnas.org/content/105/38/14325.full.pdf
  18. Handbook of binding and memory: perspectives from cognitive neuroscience, edited by Hubert D. Zimmer, Axel Mecklinger and Ulman Lindenberger: Oxford University Press, (2006). – Chapter 2, Binding memory fragments together to form declarative memories depends on cross-cortical storage, Ken A. Paller - http://faculty.wcas.northwestern.edu/~paller/BindingChapterProofs.pdf
  19. Time Compression in memory - Conway, M. A. & Loveday, C (2015). Remembering, imagining, false memories & personal meanings. Consciousness and Cognition, 33, pp. 574-581. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2014.12.002 - http://openaccess.city.ac.uk/14569/1/1-s2.0-S1053810014002293-main.pdf
  20. Daniel L. Schacter et al, (2011), Memory distortion: an adaptive perspective, Trends Cogn Sci. October; 15(10): 467– 474. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2011.08.004. - https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3183109/pdf/nihms320877.pdf
  21. Daniel M Bernstein, Elizabeth F Loftus, (2009), How to Tell If a Particular Memory Is True or False, Perspectives on Psychological Science 4, DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-6924.2009.01140.x, - https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228212832_How_to_Tell_If_a_Particular_Memory_Is_True_or_False 


DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.2.20843.54569


Thursday, 6 April 2017

Gravity emerges from history


This story starts almost fifty years ago in a quiet top floor school lab in a leafy suburb of South East London, pouring mercury into large glass spheres.


Fig1. Henry Cavendish (1798), 'Experiments to determine the Density of the Earth' 

Mr Poole, our physics master, a believer in learning through doing, was instructing us on setting up the famous 1797 Henry Cavendish experiment to measure the force of gravity between masses [1]. Our version of the experiment, allowed us to measure the force [2] reasonably accurately and from this calculate a value for the gravitational constant G [3].
(Cavendish had used spheres of lead weighing nearly 160 kg. However large masses of lead or lead alloy have the possibility of holes in the castings. To avoid this experimenters such as Austrian physicist Carl Braun and later our physics class used hollow spheres filled with mercury).


Fig 2. New Scientist 18th March 2017


The memory of this experiment was recalled while reading an article in a copy of New Scientist left by my daughter, who had said that she was just too busy to read the articles that week. The article was entitled, “What’s Up with Gravity: The force that rules the universe makes no sense” - and "Strangely attractive", p28 - It appears online as, "Rules of attraction: Why it's time to rethink how gravity works, 15th March 2017"[4].





As a precursor to the school experiment we had already learned that bodies fell to earth with an acceleration of approximately 9.8 meters per second, per second, and that on the moon this was reduced by around a sixth (1.6 m/s/s), but how exactly this related to the mass of the planet and its diameter was quite a revelation.
Recalling the experiment led me to remember that at around the same time our physics master had told us of the phenomenon of "red shift" [5], where the light from distant stars was shifted towards the red end of the spectrum because the stars were moving away from us, this due to the doppler effect and the lengthening of the wave length. Edwin Hubble discovered an approximate relationship between the redshifts of nebulae and the distances to them, which formed the basis for "Hubble's Law" [6] and theories of the expansion of the universe. (It still serves as one of the key pieces of evidence to support the Big Bang model of the universe).
Mr Poole, a very good teacher, cleverly used our newly gained understanding of gravity and the expanding universe to introduce us to Einstein's 1915 theories of general relativity and of space-time and how gravity could be considered as a curving of space-time by mass [7].



Fig 3. An image of the curvature of spacetime from Wikimedia

This view of gravity seemed to work well with things such as the observations made by Arthur Eddington and Frank Watson Dyson in 1919 on light from distant stars being curved by a large mass, the sun [8].
I remembered that this first observation of  light deflection by a large mass was performed by noting the change in position of stars as they passed near the Sun during a total solar eclipse. (The solar eclipse allowed the stars near the Sun to be observed).
The original photographic negative they produced at the time is reproduced below with small lines showing the observed position changes of the stars.

Fig 4. Negative plate produced by Arthur Eddington and Frank Watson Dyson in 1919

This phenomenon is now known as gravitational lensing [9].

Fig 5. Image of gravitational lensing prepared for NASA 

From wikimedia -An illustration of gravitational lensing. Bending light from a distant source around a massive object. The orange arrows show the apparent position of the background source. The white arrows show the path of the light from the true position of the source. 



So back in the nineteen sixties I had an understanding of three key concepts:


  1. Gravity and the gravitational constant
  2. Redshift and the expanding universe
  3. Spacetime and how massive objects caused this to curve

But then I read the 2017 New Scientist article and even the very first paragraph alarmed me.

                  GRAVITY is supposed to be reliable......what a shame, then, that it sometimes lets you down. 

"To square the whirligig rotations of galaxies and galaxy clusters with our picture of gravity, we have to invent a whole new form of matter that no one has ever seen: dark matter. 

To explain why the universe’s expansion is accelerating, we have to conjure up an equally mysterious essence known as dark energy".


Now I had certainly heard of "dark matter" and the debate on its existence, but our universe's expansion accelerating? The "big bang" theory, that I was aware of, had assumed that over time the expansion slows, so why after around 13.8 billion years was it accelerating?

Turning to Google search, I found that back in 2008 Scientific American published, "The Expanding Universe: From Slowdown to Speed Up", By Adam G. Riess, Michael S. Turner on September 23, 2008 [10].
Then I found that in 2011 three scientists shared the Nobel Prize for physics for the discovery that the expansion of the universe is speeding up [11].
The New York Times, October 4th 2011, led with, "Three astronomers won the Nobel Prize in Physics on Tuesday for discovering that the universe is apparently being blown apart by a mysterious force that cosmologists now call dark energy, a finding that has thrown the fate of the universe and indeed the nature of physics into doubt" [12].

Video 1. New York Times - TimesCast - Nobel Nod to Dark Energy, Oct 2011 




To play the TimesCast video click here











Dark Matter

While researching background for this article I noticed a new article in Scientific American which proclaimed, "Dark Matter Did Not Dominate Early Galaxies: A new study finds the mysterious substance was at most a minor constituent of large galaxies in the early universe", By Charles Q. Choi, SPACE.com on March 17, 2017 [13].
The article explained:
Using the European Southern Observatory's Very Large Telescope in Chile, the researchers examined six massive, star-forming galaxies from the early universe during the peak of galaxy formation 10 billion years ago. They analyzed the rotation of these galaxies to calculate how much dark matter they possessed.
When it comes to the Milky Way and other typical galaxies born in the current era of the universe, their "effective radius"—that is, the bright region that half their light comes from — is 50 to 80 percent dark matter, said study lead author Reinhard Genzel, an astrophysicist and director of the Max Planck Institute for Extraterrestrial Physics in Garching, Germany.

In comparison, in half the early galaxies the researchers studied, dark matter made up 10 percent or less of the galaxies' effective radius.


Two days earlier New Scientist, 15 March 2017, published -  Dark matter took its time to wrap around early galaxies [14], which discussed the work of Natascha M. Förster Schreiber at the Max-Planck-Institute for extraterrestrial physics [15].
The article explained: They found that, unlike in most modern galaxies, the stars at the edges of these early galaxies move more slowly than those closer in. “This tells us that at early stages of galaxy formation, the relative distribution of the normal matter and the dark matter was significantly different from what it is today,” says Förster Schreiber.


Curving Space Time


To understand more about how space-time is curved by massive bodies, scientists are keen to study black holes more closely. They have identified two ideal targets, firstly the black hole at the centre of our galaxy ( Sagittarius A — Sgr A) [16] and secondly a much larger one in distant galaxy M87 [17].


Fig 6. Supermassive Black Hole Sagittarius A* - NASA archive , Aug. 29, 2013

Sgr A*  has a mass equal to around 4 million Suns, but the black hole in M87 is thought to have a mass of around  6 billion solar masses.

Fig 7. NASA Hubble image of the core of galaxy M87.  Scientists believe it contains a massive black hole. 


In order to observe these in sufficient detail an audacious plan has been conceived which couples radio telescopes stationed across the globe to create a virtual observatory nearly as big as Earth [18]. This is known as the Event Horizon Telescope [19].
The experiment will commence this month (April 2017), but the data collected will be vast and analysis may well take some time.


Gravitational Waves.

Of course while thinking about gravity and the space-time continuum we really must mention gravitational waves.
Last year the Laser Interferometer Gravitational-Wave Observatory - LIGO [20] was able to identify a phenomenon, which until then was previous only a theory, gravitational waves [21].
Nature reported, in a December 2016 article on the LIGO discovery [22]:
It was hailed as an elegant confirmation of Einstein’s general theory of relativity — but ironically the discovery of gravitational waves earlier this year could herald the first evidence that the theory breaks down at the edge of black holes. Physicists have analysed the publicly released data from the Laser Interferometer Gravitational-Wave Observatory (LIGO), and claim to have found “echoes” of the waves that seem to contradict general relativity’s predictions.


Video 2. LIGO Detection: Behind the scenes of the discovery of the decade 


To understand more about the LIGO project and the discoveries made recently, a link to a video made by the team is here








I had first encountered this phenomenon through a TED lecture by MIT's Allan Adams [23].

Video 3. TED Lecture - gravitational waves 



To watch a video of the TED talk, click here
Allan starts, "1.3 billion years ago in a distant distant galaxy two black holes locked into a spiral, falling inexorably towards each other and collided converting three suns worth of stuff into pure energy in a tenth of a second. For that brief moment in time the glow was brighter than all the stars in all the galaxies in all of the known universe".






The paper on the LIGO discovery is, "Observation of Gravitational Waves from a Binary Black Hole Merger", B. P. Abbott et al.*, published 11 February 2016 [24]. The introduction opens with,
"In 1916, the year after the final formulation of the field equations of general relativity, Albert Einstein predicted the existence of gravitational waves". 



Gravity as an emergent phenomenon

Then at the end of last year, November 2016, Erik Verlinde published, "Emergent Gravity and the Dark Universe" [25], where he says:
Recent theoretical progress indicates that space-time and gravity emerge together from the entanglement structure of an underlying microscopic theory.
At the end of his paper he states:
By changing the way we view gravity, namely as an emergent phenomenon in which the Einstein equations need be derived from the thermodynamics of quantum entanglement, one also has to change the way we view the evolution of the universe.
And although this all sounds quite radical just a few months ago in December 2016 another paper was published, "First test of Verlinde’s theory of Emergent Gravity using Weak Gravitational Lensing measurements" [26].
In the introduction they explain that in the past decades, astrophysicists have repeatedly found evidence that gravity on galactic and larger scales is in excess of the gravitational potential that can be explained by visible baryonic matter [27] within the framework of General Relativity.
They conclude that:  Although this first result is quite remarkable, it is only a first step. There is still a long way to go, for both the theoretical groundwork and observational tests, before EG ( Emergent Gravity) can be considered a fully developed and solidly tested theory. In this first GGL ( galaxy-galaxy lensing ) study, however, EG appears to be a good parameter-free description of our observations.


Dark Matter versus non-Newtonian gravity

Finally on the 28th of March this year an article in TrendinTech [28] reported,
 If a study carried out by researchers at the University of St. Andrews holds true then we may need to consider rewriting Albert Einstein’s theory of gravity. The remarkable discovery made by the team saw them locating a gigantic ring of galaxies that were travelling away from us at a rate much faster than they originally thought.

The groundbreaking news came from an article published by St Andrews University entitled, "Running away from Einstein - 15 March 2017" [29]
Einstein’s theory of gravity may have to be rewritten, after researchers at the University of St Andrews found a gigantic ring of galaxies darting away from us much faster than predicted. This 10 million light year-wide ring made up of small galaxies is expanding rapidly like a mini Big Bang. The team believe our neighbouring galaxy, Andromeda, once flew past our own Galaxy at close range [30], creating a sling-shot of several small galaxies.


Fig 8. Andromeda galaxy, or M31 - Image  NASA/JPL-Caltech

Dr Hongsheng Zhao, Reader in the School of Physics and Astronomy and co-author of the paper, published in Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society by Oxford University Press, said: “If Einstein’s Gravity were correct, our Galaxy would never come close enough to Andromeda to scatter anything that fast.” If true, the discovery would force a new understanding of gravity and about our cosmos, as such a galactic flyby only makes sense if gravity weakens more slowly as galaxies drift apart than mainstream thinking suggests.
Indranil Banik, the PhD student who led the study, said: “The ring-like distribution is very peculiar. These small galaxies are like a string of raindrops flung out from a spinning umbrella. I found there is barely a 1 in 640 chance for randomly distributed galaxies to line up in the observed way. I traced their origin to a dynamical event when the Universe was only half its present age.
This tsunami-like wake in the sky was likely stirred up by a near-miss of the speeding Andromeda galaxy with our own Galaxy, the Milky Way. The two massive galaxies always orbited each other in a plane and would have scattered dwarf galaxies in their paths, perhaps explaining why the speeding dwarfs are in a plane also containing the Milky Way and Andromeda. Mr Banik added: “In Einstein’s gravity paradigm, hypothetical dark matter is always invoked. Such a high speed requires 60 times the mass we see in the stars of the Milky Way and Andromeda. However, the friction between their huge halos of dark matter would result in them merging rather than flying 2.5 million light years apart, as they must have done.”
These comments are based on a paper Published online on 13 February 2017, "Generalizing MOND to explain the missing mass in galaxy clusters" [31].

In the final conclusions of the paper, the authors explain;


In this work, we look at the possibility that the missing mass in galaxy clusters, which is still present in MOND, may be attributed to a modified gravity law that is a generalization of MOND. 
...
We then go on to use the data to determine if there is any empirical relation that could explain the missing mass in galaxy clusters. We find that there is such an expression, which works relatively well for this sample of clusters. The new formula has the ability to account for the missing mass in clusters by modifying the MOND formula in such a way that the gravity is boosted in regions of high gravitational potential whilst preserving the regular MOND formula in regions of weak gravitational potential.

The main issue with this modified equation however, is that in regions of high acceleration and high potential, such as near a star or black hole, the enhancement of gravity calculated with the formula tends to infinity and is thus in contradiction with observation. 

MOND =  Modified Newtonian Dynamics [32], Wikipedia explains this as: In physics, Modified Newtonian Dynamics (MOND) is a theory that proposes a modification of Newton's laws to account for observed properties of galaxies. Created in 1983 by Israeli physicist Mordehai Milgrom, the theory's original motivation was to explain the fact that the velocities of stars in galaxies were observed to be larger than expected based on Newtonian mechanics.



Gravity emerges from history

We seem to be approaching some kind of breakthrough in our knowledge which will hopefully lead to a greater understanding of this fundamental natural phenomenon. 

Whether studying gravitational waves or the accretion disk around massive a black hole, we strive to create models that let us grasp space and time. Will gravity prove to be an emergent phenomenon and will we need to rewrite Albert Einstein’s theory of gravity, those are the big questions which must be answered. 

However what is clear is that we are getting a lot closer to the truth, and with this truth gravity can emerge from history with its role both in the past and in the future of our universe understood.








References

  1. 1797 Henry Cavendish experiment - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cavendish_experiment
  2. The force of gravity - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravity
  3. The gravitational constant G - http://units.wikia.com/wiki/Gravitational_constant
  4. Rules of attraction: Why it's time to rethink how gravity works, 15th March 2017 - https://www.newscientist.com/article/mg23331170-200-rules-of-attraction-why-its-time-to-rethink-how-gravity-works/
  5. Redshift - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Redshift
  6. "Hubble's Law" - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hubble%27s_law
  7. The curving of space-time by mass - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spacetime
  8. Observations made by Arthur Eddington and Frank Watson Dyson in 1919 on light from distant stars being curved by a large mass, the sun - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arthur_Eddington
  9. Gravitational lensing - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravitational_lens
  10. "The Expanding Universe: From Slowdown to Speed Up", By Adam G. Riess, Michael S. Turner on September 23, 2008 - https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/expanding-universe-slows-then-speeds/
  11. Three scientists shared the 2011 Nobel Prize for physics for the discovery that the expansion of the universe is speeding up - http://www.nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/physics/laureates/2011/
  12. The New York Times, October 4th 2011, on Nobel Prize - http://www.nytimes.com/2011/10/05/science/space/05nobel.html
  13. Dark Matter Did Not Dominate Early Galaxies: A new study finds the mysterious substance was at most a minor constituent of large galaxies in the early universe, By Charles Q. Choi, SPACE.com on March 17, 2017 - https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/dark-matter-did-not-dominate-early-galaxies/
  14. Dark matter took its time to wrap around early galaxies, New Scientist, 15 March 2017 - https://www.newscientist.com/article/2124793-dark-matter-took-its-time-to-wrap-around-early-galaxies
  15. Research Activities — N. M. Förster Schreiber  - http://www.mpe.mpg.de/~forster/prof.html
  16. Sagittarius A*  - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sagittarius_A*
  17. Galaxy M87 - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Messier_87
  18. NATURE, How to hunt for a black hole with a telescope the size of Earth Astronomers hope to grab the first images of an event horizon — the point of no return, 22 March 2017 - http://www.nature.com/news/how-to-hunt-for-a-black-hole-with-a-telescope-the-size-of-earth-1.21693
  19. Event Horizon Telescope  - http://eventhorizontelescope.org/
  20. LIGO - https://www.ligo.caltech.edu/
  21. Gravitational Waves - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravitational_wave
  22. NATURE, LIGO black hole echoes hint at general-relativity breakdown Gravitational-wave data show tentative signs of firewalls or other exotic physics, 09 December 2016 - http://www.nature.com/news/ligo-black-hole-echoes-hint-at-general-relativity-breakdown-1.21135
  23. Allan Adams (MIT) - http://www.mit.edu/~awa/resume.html
  24. Observation of Gravitational Waves from a Binary Black Hole Merger, B. P. Abbott et al.* (LIGO Scientific Collaboration and Virgo Collaboration) (Received 21 January 2016; published 11 February 2016) - https://journals.aps.org/prl/pdf/10.1103/PhysRevLett.116.061102
  25. Emergent Gravity and the Dark Universe - https://arxiv.org/pdf/1611.02269.pdf
  26. First test of Verlinde’s theory of Emergent Gravity using Weak Gravitational Lensing measurements, Margot M. Brouwer1, Manus R. Visser, Andrej Dvornik, et al. - https://arxiv.org/pdf/1612.03034v2.pdf
  27. Baryonic Matter - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Baryonic_dark_matter
  28. New Theory of Gravity Emerges, March 28, 2017 - http://www.trendintech.com/2017/03/28/new-theory-of-gravity-emerges/
  29. Running away from Einstein - 15 March 2017 - https://www.st-andrews.ac.uk/news/archive/2017/title,1168412,en.php
  30. Indranil Banik, Hongsheng Zhao; Dynamical history of the Local Group in ΛCDM – II. Including external perturbers in 3D. Mon Not R Astron Soc 2017; 467 (2): 2180-2198. doi: 10.1093/mnras/stx151- https://academic.oup.com/mnras/article-lookup/doi/10.1093/mnras/stx151
  31. Generalizing MOND to explain the missing mass in galaxy clusters, Alistair O. Hodson and Hongsheng Zhao, A&A, 598 (2017) A127, Published online: 13 February 2017 - https://arxiv.org/abs/1701.03369
  32. Modified Newtonian Dynamics (MOND)https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Modified_Newtonian_dynamics




Figures

Fig1. Henry Cavendish (1798), 'Experiments to determine the Density of the Earth' in McKenzie, A.S. ed. Scientific Memoirs Vol.9: The Laws of Gravitation, American Book Co. 1900, p.62 (Wikipedia)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cavendish_experiment
Fig2. Image of printed copy of New Scientist, 18th March 2017 (Image by author)
Fig 3. An image of the curvature of space-time (Wikimedia)
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Spacetime_curvature.png
Fig 4. Negative plate produced by Arthur Eddington and Frank Watson Dyson in 1919 (Wikimedia)
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:1919_eclipse_negative.jpg
Fig 5. Image of gravitational lensing prepared for NASA under Contract NAS5-26555(Wikimedia)
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Gravitational_lens-full.jpg
Fig 6. Super massive Black Hole Sagittarius A* - NASA archive , Aug. 29, 2013
https://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/chandra/multimedia/black-hole-SagittariusA.html
Fig 7. NASA Hubble image of the core of galaxy M87.  Scientists believe it contains a massive black hole. 
https://starchild.gsfc.nasa.gov/docs/StarChild/universe_level2/m87_disk.html

Fig 8. Andromeda galaxy, or M31, Image May 15, 2012, "The Galaxy Next Door",  NASA/JPL-Caltech - https://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/galex/pia15416.html


Videos
V 1. New York Times - TimesCast - Nobel Nod to Dark Energy, Oct 2011 - https://static01.nyt.com/video/players/offsite/index.html?videoId=100000001090927

Lead Image

The Moon 4pm on the 4th of April, Ylihärmä, Finland (by the author)



Dedication

This article is dedicated to my daughter Nicola (a physicist)








#gravity
#gravitywaves
#blackholes
#einstein